Thoughts and Resources On Teaching About Climate Change

I have taught about climate change for a decade now; it occupies an ever-expanding unit in my Globalization course. When I began, I was explaining the greenhouse effect. Now, students know the science by the time they leave middle school I have decided that teaching about the changing climate is most effective when organized around the concept of solutions.

youthclimateaction.smallWhat follows are thoughts on how this topic might be framed, followed by many links, a portion of which are specific to Portland, Oregon, and the Northwestern USA. But the idea here is to think about how to divide students’ study into layers of hopeful action, so the study of this daunting issue doesn’t merely make them feel helpless. (The flyer above is from an evening hosted by my class in the autumn of 2014.)

In Portland, then, thinking about climate change on a local level means looking at what the city government is doing in regards to transportation, waste management, growth, and, perhaps, a binding resolution for the city.  On a state level, a lot of energy in Oregon is focused on a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade scheme. The Northwest Economic Research Center at Portland State University has made a compelling proposal to the state legislature and a carbon tax bill is coming (slowly). For students, the next movement is divestment, especially at colleges. (This is something my school will likely think about in the next few years as well.) In the Northwestern US, there are also ongoing fights over coal export terminals and the like.  These places are both symbolic and important: do our students think it’s a good idea to send dirty coal to China?

On the national level, tailpipe regulations, a carbon tax, regulations on coal-fired power plants, etc. It also means using the Clean Air Act or the Public Trust Doctrine to compel the government to protect our common atmosphere. This is where Professor Mary Wood at U of O comes in. Congress is hopeless, so the courts are probably the way to go. That and direct protest, though teachers might find this route difficult. Globally, my hope rests with the IPCC at the UN and, believe it or not, the World Bank. Not much students can do there but learn where the bodies are buried and how it boils down to the global north, especially the US, telling China and India they don’t get to go through a carbon-based industrial age.

In the classroom, I can frame climate change in a number of ways. It is an environmental issue, but I have come to the conclusion that, in the US, this route is a loser. This argument has been made for 25 years and it’s getting nowhere in this country. Another way is as an economic issue. This is where William Nordhaus of Yale comes in with his Climate Casino book. It’s a tough read for kids but has some good graphs. You can pay now slow change and mitigate damage or pay much more later. That idea.

Another way to pursue a solution is to see this as a legal issue. The federal government, this reasoning goes, is breaking the law by not stepping in to regulate this obvious pollutant to a degree that will stave off disaster. I think this is likely to be effective in the long run.

That and framing climate as a moral issue. Like slavery or civil rights. It is a civil rights issue, the right to live in a safe world, the right to inherit a land not devastated by species movement and desertification. God made Adam the keeper of the garden but he didn’t tell Adam he could burn the place down. This angle has lead to the action by the Catholic Church and a lot of evangelicals. It is immoral to leave the world in tatters. I think starting here and then achieving change through the courts (aided by technological efficiency, etc.) may be the most effective path. But I am open to change on this account. I am not, by the way, a fan of geo-engineering. This sounds lazy and scary. Nordhaus has a good chapter on this topic.

So here are some links. For my students, seeing them this way is helpful. Forgive me if some of the links are dated.

Local/State Links

The big players here are the City of Portland, with its impressive Climate Action Plan. The problem is it is not the law. One graph worth noting is how Portland’s output started falling several years ago and it remains ahead of the national trend.

METRO: Climate Smart Communities

Portland CAP Update

PDX CAP Year Two Report, 2011

PDX CAP Executive Summary

PDX CAP, 2009

Apps for Climate Change

SB306 Carbon Tax Study/Proposal

Eugene Climate Resolution

Portland Rising Tide

At the state level, I am hoping that Governor Brown’s desire to be elected in her own right (she replaced John Kitzhaber who resigned during a corruption scandal) will mean bold leadership on climate. The major place for hope is the Carbon Tax plan. The first link gives a brief summary.

Carbon Tax and Shift: How to Make it Work for Oregon…

Regional Climate Action Plan

Our Opinion: Time to stop choking on dirty diesel (mentions Catlin)

Where Does Oregon’s Power Come From?

The Governor’s 10-Year Energy Plan

Hot of the press!: Climate Change Preparation Strategy published for public review

Keep Oregon Cool

National Links

EPA’s Climate page, include big polluters map

NASA’s Climate Change page

Blumenauer takes Congressional carbon tax helm

Carbon Tax Center

EPA home page on climate change

NOAA: State of the Climate

The White House CG Page

The White House Climate Action Plan

Northwest Earth Institute

XL Dissent youth movement

As Fracking Booms, Growing Concerns About Wastewater

Global Links

Obviously, the big player here is the IPCC.

Map showing elevation and population in Bangladesh

National emissions ranking and emissions per capita, 2010

Growing Clamor About Inequities of Climate Crisis

Is Climate Change Altering Storms? (nytimes.com)

IPCC 2013 Summary for Policy Makers

Global Emissions Breakdown (I love this one)

CLIMATE CHANGE 2014 SYNTHESIS REPORT

Map showing warming for any place on earth

C40 Cities: Climate Leadership Group

Solutions

There are so many ways to attack the problems. One is through the development of new technologies. Others are by disincentivizing burning the bad stuff. This is where the debate between cap and trade, which CA has, and a carbon tax, which British Columbia has, comes into play.

Other actions include protest, petition, and lawsuits. The organization we worked with was Our Children’s Trust, which helps young people sue the government under the Public Trust Doctrine.

Solar Freakin Roadways!

New Yorker: A Star in a Bottle

Story of Stuff: Cap and Trade

Plan B 4.0

NOAA’s page on adaptation in the regional shellfish industry

OUR CHILDREN’S TRUST

The Guardian’s “Keep It In the Ground” Campaign

Pope Francis, “Laudato Si,” aka the Climate Change Encyclical

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s